settingsLogin | Registersettings

[Openstack-operators] Forum Brainstorming???

0 votes

Hi everyone,

Welcome to the topic selection process for our first Forum in Boston. If
you've participated in an ops meetup before, this should seem pretty
comfortable. If not, note that this is not a classic conference track
with speakers and presentations. OpenStack community members (participants
in development teams, working groups, and other interested individuals)
discuss the topics they want to cover and get alignment on and we welcome
your participation.

The Forum is for the entire community to come together; create a neutral
space rather than having separate “ops” and “dev” days. Boston marks the
start of the Queen's release cycle, where ideas and requirements will be
gathered. Users should aim to come armed with feedback from February's
Ocata release if at all possible. We aim to ensure the broadest coverage of
topics that will allow for multiple parts of the community getting together
to discuss key areas within our community/projects.

Examples of the types of discussions and some sessions that might fit
within each one:

  • Strategic, whole-of-community discussions, to think about the big
    picture, including beyond just one release cycle and new technologies

  • eg Making OpenStack One Platform for containers/VMs/Bare Metal
    (Strategic
    session) the entire community congregates to share opinions on how to make
    OpenStack achieve its integration engine goal

  • Cross-project sessions, in a similar vein to what has happened at
    past design summits, but with increased emphasis on issues that are
    relevant to all areas of the community

  • eg Rolling Upgrades at Scale (Cross-Project session) – the Large
    Deployments Team collaborates with Nova, Cinder and Keystone to tackle
    issues that come up with rolling upgrades when there’s a large number of
    machines.

  • Project-specific sessions, where developers can ask users specific
    questions about their experience, users can provide feedback from the last
    release and cross-community collaboration on the priorities, and ‘blue sky’
    ideas for the next release.

  • eg Neutron Pain Points (Project-Specific session) – Co-organized
    by neutron developers and users. Neutron developers bring some specific
    questions they want answered, Neutron users bring feedback from the latest
    release and ideas about the future.

There are two stages to the brainstorming:
1. Starting today, set up an etherpad with your group/team, or use one
on the list and start discussing ideas you'd like to talk about at the
Forum. Then, through +1s on etherpads and mailing list discussion, work out
which ones are the most needed - just like you did prior to the ops
events.
2. Then, in a couple of weeks, we will open up a more formal web-based
tool for submission of abstracts that came out of the brainstorming on top.

We expect working groups may make their own etherpads, however the User
Committee offers a catch-all to get the widest feedback possible:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-UC-brainstorming

Feel free to use that, or make one for your group and add it to the list
at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum/Boston2017

Thanks,
User Committee https://www.openstack.org/foundation/user-committee/


OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
asked Mar 2, 2017 in openstack-operators by Shamail (5,040 points)   1 2 3

4 Responses

0 votes

Thanks Shamail -

We’ve just completed a first pass on our brainstorming in the Scientific WG. Some ideas from a research computing perspective are here:

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-UC-brainstorming-scientific-wg

More input from WG members (and anyone else) is of course welcome and appreciated.

Best wishes,
Stig

On 27 Feb 2017, at 20:38, Shamail Tahir itzshamail@gmail.com wrote:

Hi everyone,

Welcome to the topic selection process for our first Forum in Boston. If you've participated in an ops meetup before, this should seem pretty comfortable. If not, note that this is not a classic conference track with speakers and presentations. OpenStack community members (participants in development teams, working groups, and other interested individuals) discuss the topics they want to cover and get alignment on and we welcome your participation.

The Forum is for the entire community to come together; create a neutral space rather than having separate “ops” and “dev” days. Boston marks the start of the Queen's release cycle, where ideas and requirements will be gathered. Users should aim to come armed with feedback from February's Ocata release if at all possible. We aim to ensure the broadest coverage of topics that will allow for multiple parts of the community getting together to discuss key areas within our community/projects.

Examples of the types of discussions and some sessions that might fit within each one:
• Strategic, whole-of-community discussions, to think about the big picture, including beyond just one release cycle and new technologies
• eg Making OpenStack One Platform for containers/VMs/Bare Metal (Strategic session) the entire community congregates to share opinions on how to make OpenStack achieve its integration engine goal
• Cross-project sessions, in a similar vein to what has happened at past design summits, but with increased emphasis on issues that are relevant to all areas of the community
• eg Rolling Upgrades at Scale (Cross-Project session) – the Large Deployments Team collaborates with Nova, Cinder and Keystone to tackle issues that come up with rolling upgrades when there’s a large number of machines.
• Project-specific sessions, where developers can ask users specific questions about their experience, users can provide feedback from the last release and cross-community collaboration on the priorities, and ‘blue sky’ ideas for the next release.
• eg Neutron Pain Points (Project-Specific session) – Co-organized by neutron developers and users. Neutron developers bring some specific questions they want answered, Neutron users bring feedback from the latest release and ideas about the future.

There are two stages to the brainstorming:
1. Starting today, set up an etherpad with your group/team, or use one on the list and start discussing ideas you'd like to talk about at the Forum. Then, through +1s on etherpads and mailing list discussion, work out which ones are the most needed - just like you did prior to the ops events.
2. Then, in a couple of weeks, we will open up a more formal web-based tool for submission of abstracts that came out of the brainstorming on top.

We expect working groups may make their own etherpads, however the User Committee offers a catch-all to get the widest feedback possible:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-UC-brainstorming

Feel free to use that, or make one for your group and add it to the list at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum/Boston2017

Thanks,
User Committee


OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators


OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
responded Mar 1, 2017 by stig.openstack_at_te (2,540 points)   1 1 2
0 votes

I remember there was a discussion about having a session for all UC Working
Group to meet together for collaboration and sharing works. Would this be a
session submitted by UC?

Also there was a previous discussion about improving the OpenStack Summit
session/track selection process in the track-chair mail list. Wondering if
that should be included in Forum?

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Shamail Tahir itzshamail@gmail.com
wrote:

Hi everyone,

Welcome to the topic selection process for our first Forum in Boston. If
you've participated in an ops meetup before, this should seem pretty
comfortable. If not, note that this is not a classic conference track
with speakers and presentations. OpenStack community members (participants
in development teams, working groups, and other interested individuals)
discuss the topics they want to cover and get alignment on and we welcome
your participation.

The Forum is for the entire community to come together; create a neutral
space rather than having separate “ops” and “dev” days. Boston marks the
start of the Queen's release cycle, where ideas and requirements will be
gathered. Users should aim to come armed with feedback from February's
Ocata release if at all possible. We aim to ensure the broadest coverage of
topics that will allow for multiple parts of the community getting together
to discuss key areas within our community/projects.

Examples of the types of discussions and some sessions that might fit
within each one:

  • Strategic, whole-of-community discussions, to think about the big
    picture, including beyond just one release cycle and new technologies

  • eg Making OpenStack One Platform for containers/VMs/Bare Metal (Strategic
    session) the entire community congregates to share opinions on how to make
    OpenStack achieve its integration engine goal

  • Cross-project sessions, in a similar vein to what has happened at
    past design summits, but with increased emphasis on issues that are
    relevant to all areas of the community

  • eg Rolling Upgrades at Scale (Cross-Project session) – the Large
    Deployments Team collaborates with Nova, Cinder and Keystone to tackle
    issues that come up with rolling upgrades when there’s a large number of
    machines.

  • Project-specific sessions, where developers can ask users specific
    questions about their experience, users can provide feedback from the last
    release and cross-community collaboration on the priorities, and ‘blue sky’
    ideas for the next release.

  • eg Neutron Pain Points (Project-Specific session) – Co-organized
    by neutron developers and users. Neutron developers bring some specific
    questions they want answered, Neutron users bring feedback from the latest
    release and ideas about the future.

There are two stages to the brainstorming:
1. Starting today, set up an etherpad with your group/team, or use one
on the list and start discussing ideas you'd like to talk about at the
Forum. Then, through +1s on etherpads and mailing list discussion, work out
which ones are the most needed - just like you did prior to the ops
events.
2. Then, in a couple of weeks, we will open up a more formal web-based
tool for submission of abstracts that came out of the brainstorming on top.

We expect working groups may make their own etherpads, however the User
Committee offers a catch-all to get the widest feedback possible:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-UC-brainstorming

Feel free to use that, or make one for your group and add it to the list
at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum/Boston2017

Thanks,
User Committee https://www.openstack.org/foundation/user-committee/


User-committee mailing list
User-committee@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee


OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
responded Mar 1, 2017 by Yih_Leong,_Sun. (440 points)  
0 votes

Thanks Stig. I added your etherpad to the wiki page[1].

[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum/Boston2017#Team-specific

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Stig Telfer stig.openstack@telfer.org
wrote:

Thanks Shamail -

We’ve just completed a first pass on our brainstorming in the Scientific
WG. Some ideas from a research computing perspective are here:

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-UC-brainstorming-scientific-wg

More input from WG members (and anyone else) is of course welcome and
appreciated.

Best wishes,
Stig

On 27 Feb 2017, at 20:38, Shamail Tahir itzshamail@gmail.com wrote:

Hi everyone,

Welcome to the topic selection process for our first Forum in Boston. If
you've participated in an ops meetup before, this should seem pretty
comfortable. If not, note that this is not a classic conference track with
speakers and presentations. OpenStack community members (participants in
development teams, working groups, and other interested individuals)
discuss the topics they want to cover and get alignment on and we welcome
your participation.

The Forum is for the entire community to come together; create a neutral
space rather than having separate “ops” and “dev” days. Boston marks the
start of the Queen's release cycle, where ideas and requirements will be
gathered. Users should aim to come armed with feedback from February's
Ocata release if at all possible. We aim to ensure the broadest coverage of
topics that will allow for multiple parts of the community getting together
to discuss key areas within our community/projects.

Examples of the types of discussions and some sessions that might fit
within each one:
• Strategic, whole-of-community discussions, to think about the
big picture, including beyond just one release cycle and new technologies
• eg Making OpenStack One Platform for containers/VMs/Bare Metal
(Strategic session) the entire community congregates to share opinions on
how to make OpenStack achieve its integration engine goal
• Cross-project sessions, in a similar vein to what has happened
at past design summits, but with increased emphasis on issues that are
relevant to all areas of the community
• eg Rolling Upgrades at Scale (Cross-Project session) – the Large
Deployments Team collaborates with Nova, Cinder and Keystone to tackle
issues that come up with rolling upgrades when there’s a large number of
machines.
• Project-specific sessions, where developers can ask users
specific questions about their experience, users can provide feedback from
the last release and cross-community collaboration on the priorities, and
‘blue sky’ ideas for the next release.
• eg Neutron Pain Points (Project-Specific session) – Co-organized
by neutron developers and users. Neutron developers bring some specific
questions they want answered, Neutron users bring feedback from the latest
release and ideas about the future.

There are two stages to the brainstorming:
1. Starting today, set up an etherpad with your group/team, or use
one on the list and start discussing ideas you'd like to talk about at the
Forum. Then, through +1s on etherpads and mailing list discussion, work out
which ones are the most needed - just like you did prior to the ops events.
2. Then, in a couple of weeks, we will open up a more formal
web-based tool for submission of abstracts that came out of the
brainstorming on top.

We expect working groups may make their own etherpads, however the User
Committee offers a catch-all to get the widest feedback possible:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-UC-brainstorming

Feel free to use that, or make one for your group and add it to the list
at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum/Boston2017

Thanks,
User Committee


OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

--
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
t: @ShamailXD
tz: Eastern Time


OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
responded Mar 2, 2017 by Shamail (5,040 points)   1 2 3
0 votes

A brainstorming etherpad for Telecom&NFV ideas and requirements has been created. Please enter your proposed Telecom&NFV Forum discussion topics here [1]. This etherpad will be used to collect topics from groups inside and outside of the OpenStack community. Thank you.

[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-UC-brainstorming-Telecom&NFV

NOTE: I apologize if this is not in the thread. I receive a digest and am not sure how to reply to one item in it.

On Tuesday, February 28, 2017 5:00am, openstack-operators-request@lists.openstack.org said:

Send OpenStack-operators mailing list submissions to
openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
openstack-operators-request@lists.openstack.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
openstack-operators-owner@lists.openstack.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of OpenStack-operators digest..."

  1. Forum Brainstorming??? (Shamail Tahir)

Message: 6
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:38:30 -0500
From: Shamail Tahir itzshamail@gmail.com
To: openstack-operators openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org,
user-committee user-committee@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [Openstack-operators] Forum Brainstorming???
Message-ID:
CALrdpTWJ8fyor-oMQ0soJby-WJfYgW8Dw-W3BkvHbjidgJ9bAw@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi everyone,

Welcome to the topic selection process for our first Forum in Boston. If
you've participated in an ops meetup before, this should seem pretty
comfortable. If not, note that this is not a classic conference track
with speakers and presentations. OpenStack community members (participants
in development teams, working groups, and other interested individuals)
discuss the topics they want to cover and get alignment on and we welcome
your participation.

The Forum is for the entire community to come together; create a neutral
space rather than having separate ?ops? and ?dev? days. Boston marks the
start of the Queen's release cycle, where ideas and requirements will be
gathered. Users should aim to come armed with feedback from February's
Ocata release if at all possible. We aim to ensure the broadest coverage of
topics that will allow for multiple parts of the community getting together
to discuss key areas within our community/projects.

Examples of the types of discussions and some sessions that might fit
within each one:

  • Strategic, whole-of-community discussions, to think about the big
    picture, including beyond just one release cycle and new technologies

  • eg Making OpenStack One Platform for containers/VMs/Bare Metal
    (Strategic
    session) the entire community congregates to share opinions on how to make
    OpenStack achieve its integration engine goal

  • Cross-project sessions, in a similar vein to what has happened at
    past design summits, but with increased emphasis on issues that are
    relevant to all areas of the community

  • eg Rolling Upgrades at Scale (Cross-Project session) ? the Large
    Deployments Team collaborates with Nova, Cinder and Keystone to tackle
    issues that come up with rolling upgrades when there?s a large number of
    machines.

  • Project-specific sessions, where developers can ask users specific
    questions about their experience, users can provide feedback from the last
    release and cross-community collaboration on the priorities, and ?blue sky?
    ideas for the next release.

  • eg Neutron Pain Points (Project-Specific session) ? Co-organized
    by neutron developers and users. Neutron developers bring some specific
    questions they want answered, Neutron users bring feedback from the latest
    release and ideas about the future.

There are two stages to the brainstorming:
1. Starting today, set up an etherpad with your group/team, or use one
on the list and start discussing ideas you'd like to talk about at the
Forum. Then, through +1s on etherpads and mailing list discussion, work out
which ones are the most needed - just like you did prior to the ops
events.
2. Then, in a couple of weeks, we will open up a more formal web-based
tool for submission of abstracts that came out of the brainstorming on top.

We expect working groups may make their own etherpads, however the User
Committee offers a catch-all to get the widest feedback possible:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-UC-brainstorming

Feel free to use that, or make one for your group and add it to the list
at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum/Boston2017

Thanks,
User Committee https://www.openstack.org/foundation/user-committee/

OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

End of OpenStack-operators Digest, Vol 76, Issue 39


--
Regards,

Kathy Cacciatore
Consulting Marketing Manager
OpenStack Foundation
1-512-970-2807 (mobile)
Part time: Monday - Thursday, 9am - 2pm US CT
kathyc@openstack.org


OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
responded Mar 6, 2017 by Kathy_Cacciatore (600 points)   2
...