Thanks for the prompt response. For the second one, are you working on the existing bug, or a new one? If it?s a new bug, please let me know the bug number.
On 6/10/14, 5:09 PM, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang at intel.com<mailto:yunhong.jiang at intel.com>> wrote:
For your first question, I suspect it?s something wrong and should be ?devi_id?, which is the hypervisor?s identification for the device. I will leave Yongli to have more comments on it.
For the second one, thanks for point the issue out. Yes, I?m working on fixing it.
From: Robert Li (baoli) [mailto:baoli at cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:46 PM
To: Jiang, Yunhong; He, Yongli
Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev][nova][pci] A couple of questions
Hi Yunhong & Yongli,
In the routine preparepcidevicesforuse(), it?s referring to dev[?hypervisorname?]. I didn?t see code that?s setting it up, or the libvirt nodedev xml includes hypervisor_name. Is this specific to Xen?
Another question is about the issue that was raised in this review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82206/. It?s about the use of node id or host name in the PCI device table. I?d like to know you guys? thoughts on that.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...