settingsLogin | Registersettings

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Third-Party CI Issue: direct access to review.openstack.org port 29418 required

0 votes

All,

I've been working on setting up our Cinder 3rd party CI setup.
I ran into an issue where Zuul requires direct access to review.openstack.org port 29418, which is currently blocked in my environment. It should be unblocked around the end of June.

Since this will likely affect other vendors, I encourage you to take a few minutes and check if this affects you in order to allow sufficient time to resolve.

Please follow the instructions in section "Reading the Event Stream" here: [1]
Make sure you can get the event stream ~without~ any tunnels or proxies, etc. such as corkscrew [2].
(Double-check that any such configurations are commented out in: ~/.ssh/config and /etc/ssh/ssh_config)

Ramy (irc: asselin)

[1] http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corkscrew_(program)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140609/5ba5a01f/attachment.html

asked Jun 9, 2014 in openstack-dev by Asselin,_Ramy (4,700 points)   1 2 5
retagged Jan 28, 2015 by admin

4 Responses

0 votes

Hi Asselin,

Do you had problems with other ports? Is it need to have outbound access to
other ports?

Erlon

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Asselin, Ramy <ramy.asselin at hp.com> wrote:

All,

I?ve been working on setting up our Cinder 3rd party CI setup.

I ran into an issue where Zuul requires direct access to
review.openstack.org port 29418, which is currently blocked in my
environment. It should be unblocked around the end of June.

Since this will likely affect other vendors, I encourage you to take a few
minutes and check if this affects you in order to allow sufficient time
to resolve.

Please follow the instructions in section ?Reading the Event Stream? here:
[1]

Make sure you can get the event stream ~without~ any tunnels or proxies,
etc. such as corkscrew [2].

(Double-check that any such configurations are commented out in:
~/.ssh/config and /etc/ssh/ssh_config)

Ramy (irc: asselin)

[1] http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corkscrew_(program)


OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:

responded Jun 13, 2014 by Erlon_Cruz (3,020 points)   2 2
0 votes

As far as I know, that?s the only non-standard port that needs to be opened in order to do 3rd party ci.
Ramy

From: Erlon Cruz [mailto:sombrafam at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 4:03 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Third-Party CI Issue: direct access to review.openstack.org port 29418 required

Hi Asselin,

Do you had problems with other ports? Is it need to have outbound access to other ports?

Erlon

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Asselin, Ramy <ramy.asselin at hp.com<mailto:ramy.asselin at hp.com>> wrote:
All,

I?ve been working on setting up our Cinder 3rd party CI setup.
I ran into an issue where Zuul requires direct access to review.openstack.org port 29418, which is currently blocked in my environment. It should be unblocked around the end of June.

Since this will likely affect other vendors, I encourage you to take a few minutes and check if this affects you in order to allow sufficient time to resolve.

Please follow the instructions in section ?Reading the Event Stream? here: [1]
Make sure you can get the event stream ~without~ any tunnels or proxies, etc. such as corkscrew [2].
(Double-check that any such configurations are commented out in: ~/.ssh/config and /etc/ssh/ssh_config)

Ramy (irc: asselin)

[1] http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corkscrew_(program)


OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:

responded Jun 13, 2014 by Asselin,_Ramy (4,700 points)   1 2 5
0 votes

Ok thanks.

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Asselin, Ramy <ramy.asselin at hp.com> wrote:

As far as I know, that?s the only non-standard port that needs to be
opened in order to do 3rd party ci.

Ramy

From: Erlon Cruz [mailto:sombrafam at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 4:03 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Third-Party CI Issue: direct
access to review.openstack.org port 29418 required

Hi Asselin,

Do you had problems with other ports? Is it need to have outbound access
to other ports?

Erlon

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Asselin, Ramy <ramy.asselin at hp.com> wrote:

All,

I?ve been working on setting up our Cinder 3rd party CI setup.

I ran into an issue where Zuul requires direct access to
review.openstack.org port 29418, which is currently blocked in my
environment. It should be unblocked around the end of June.

Since this will likely affect other vendors, I encourage you to take a few
minutes and check if this affects you in order to allow sufficient time
to resolve.

Please follow the instructions in section ?Reading the Event Stream? here:
[1]

Make sure you can get the event stream ~without~ any tunnels or proxies,
etc. such as corkscrew [2].

(Double-check that any such configurations are commented out in:
~/.ssh/config and /etc/ssh/ssh_config)

Ramy (irc: asselin)

[1] http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corkscrew_(program)


OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:

responded Jun 13, 2014 by Erlon_Cruz (3,020 points)   2 2
0 votes

On 06/13/2014 10:32 AM, Asselin, Ramy wrote:
As far as I know, that?s the only non-standard port that needs to be opened in order to do 3rd party ci.
Ramy

From: Erlon Cruz [mailto:sombrafam at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 4:03 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Third-Party CI Issue: direct access to review.openstack.org port 29418 required

Hi Asselin,

Do you had problems with other ports? Is it need to have outbound access to other ports?

Erlon
Gerrit sshd documentation can be found here:
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/config-gerrit.html#sshd

OpenStack Gerrit uses ports 29418 and 443. The document mentions the use
of ports 22 and 8080 which OpenStack Gerrit does not use.

Thanks,
Anita.

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Asselin, Ramy <ramy.asselin at hp.com<mailto:ramy.asselin at hp.com>> wrote:
All,

I?ve been working on setting up our Cinder 3rd party CI setup.
I ran into an issue where Zuul requires direct access to review.openstack.org port 29418, which is currently blocked in my environment. It should be unblocked around the end of June.

Since this will likely affect other vendors, I encourage you to take a few minutes and check if this affects you in order to allow sufficient time to resolve.

Please follow the instructions in section ?Reading the Event Stream? here: [1]
Make sure you can get the event stream ~without~ any tunnels or proxies, etc. such as corkscrew [2].
(Double-check that any such configurations are commented out in: ~/.ssh/config and /etc/ssh/ssh_config)

Ramy (irc: asselin)

[1] http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corkscrew_(program)


OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
responded Jun 13, 2014 by Anita_Kuno (21,320 points)   3 3 4
...