Question

Hello,

I’m trying to develop fault tolerance supporting OpenStack on Docker/CoreOS. I think this kind of approaching is to getting the following advantages:
- Easy to Deploy
- Easy to Test
- Easy to Scale-out
- Fault Tolerance

Those who are interested in non-stop operation and easy extension of OpenStack, please see the following link https://github.com/ContinUSE/openstack-on-coreos.

This work is currently in the beginning. Please contact me if you have any comments, or questions.

Thanks,
JW

---

OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Hello,

I’m trying to develop fault tolerance supporting OpenStack on Docker/CoreOS. I think this kind of approaching is to getting the following advantages:
   - Easy to Deploy
   - Easy to Test
   - Easy to Scale-out
   - Fault Tolerance

Those who are interested in non-stop operation and easy extension of OpenStack, please see the following link https://github.com/ContinUSE/openstack-on-coreos.

This work is currently in the beginning. Please contact me if you have any comments, or questions.

Thanks,
JW
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Answer 1

Hey,

Did you have a look at koala (https://github.com/stackforge/kolla)?
Trying to avoid duplicating work :)

On 29 Apr 2015, at 14:08, CoreOS jwlee.phobias@gmail.com wrote:

Hello,

I’m trying to develop fault tolerance supporting OpenStack on Docker/CoreOS. I think this kind of approaching is to getting the following advantages:
- Easy to Deploy
- Easy to Test
- Easy to Scale-out
- Fault Tolerance

Those who are interested in non-stop operation and easy extension of OpenStack, please see the following link https://github.com/ContinUSE/openstack-on-coreos.

This work is currently in the beginning. Please contact me if you have any comments, or questions.

Thanks,
JW

---

OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Cheers.
––––
Sébastien Han
Cloud Architect

"Always give 100%. Unless you're giving blood."

Phone: +33 (0)1 49 70 99 72
Mail: sebastien.han@enovance.com
Address : 11 bis, rue Roquépine - 75008 Paris
Web : www.enovance.com - Twitter : @enovance

---

OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Hey,

Did you have a look at koala (https://github.com/stackforge/kolla)?
Trying to avoid duplicating work :)

> On 29 Apr 2015, at 14:08, CoreOS <jwlee.phobias@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I’m trying to develop fault tolerance supporting OpenStack on Docker/CoreOS. I think this kind of approaching is to getting the following advantages:
>   - Easy to Deploy
>   - Easy to Test
>   - Easy to Scale-out
>   - Fault Tolerance
>
> Those who are interested in non-stop operation and easy extension of OpenStack, please see the following link https://github.com/ContinUSE/openstack-on-coreos.
>
> This work is currently in the beginning. Please contact me if you have any comments, or questions.
>
> Thanks,
> JW
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators


Cheers.
––––
Sébastien Han
Cloud Architect

"Always give 100%. Unless you're giving blood."

Phone: +33 (0)1 49 70 99 72
Mail: sebastien.han@enovance.com
Address : 11 bis, rue Roquépine - 75008 Paris
Web : www.enovance.com - Twitter : @enovance

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

---

signature.asc

Answer 2

Have you looked at the kolla project?

Thanks,
Kevin

---

From: CoreOS
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 5:08:12 AM
To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [Openstack-operators] OpenStack Dockerizing on CoreOS

Hello,

I’m trying to develop fault tolerance supporting OpenStack on Docker/CoreOS. I think this kind of approaching is to getting the following advantages:
- Easy to Deploy
- Easy to Test
- Easy to Scale-out
- Fault Tolerance

Those who are interested in non-stop operation and easy extension of OpenStack, please see the following link https://github.com/ContinUSE/openstack-on-coreos.

This work is currently in the beginning. Please contact me if you have any comments, or questions.

Thanks,
JW

---

OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

---

OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Have you looked at the kolla project?

Thanks,
Kevin

 

---

From: CoreOS
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 5:08:12 AM
To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [Openstack-operators] OpenStack Dockerizing on CoreOS

Hello,

I’m trying to develop fault tolerance supporting OpenStack on Docker/CoreOS. I think this kind of approaching is to getting the following advantages:
   - Easy to Deploy
   - Easy to Test
   - Easy to Scale-out
   - Fault Tolerance

Those who are interested in non-stop operation and easy extension of OpenStack, please see the following link https://github.com/ContinUSE/openstack-on-coreos.

This work is currently in the beginning. Please contact me if you have any comments, or questions.

Thanks,
JW
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Answer 3

You may also want to check out giftwrap (
https://github.com/blueboxgroup/giftwrap ) and its helper giftwrap-wrapper
( https://github.com/blueboxgroup/giftwrap-wrapper ) which builds packages
and/or docker containers for each openstack project based on a manifest
file which contains their git location and version as well as letting you
specifiy extra requirements etc.

I've looked over the koilla project and don't like the fact that it uses
the system packages for openstack, nor do I particularly like the way its
handling configuration.

I also think that it makes a ton of sense to create config templates built
with confd so that you can configure the projects by either environment
variables or etcd/confd.

I have a project called Factorish (https://github.com/factorish/factorish)
which aims to take random apps and run them in a sensible way inside a
docker container that ties in confd, etcdctl and runit and some
healthchecking which has worked very well for me so far and have been
planning on starting to build out openstack packages using it, but haven't
gotten very far yet due to a lack of time.

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Fox, Kevin M Kevin.Fox@pnnl.gov wrote:

Have you looked at the kolla project?

Thanks,
Kevin

---

From: CoreOS
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 5:08:12 AM
To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [Openstack-operators] OpenStack Dockerizing on CoreOS

Hello,

I’m trying to develop fault tolerance supporting OpenStack on
Docker/CoreOS. I think this kind of approaching is to getting the following
advantages:
- Easy to Deploy
- Easy to Test
- Easy to Scale-out
- Fault Tolerance

Those who are interested in non-stop operation and easy extension of
OpenStack, please see the following link
https://github.com/ContinUSE/openstack-on-coreos.

This work is currently in the beginning. Please contact me if you have any
comments, or questions.

Thanks,
JW

---

OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

---

OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

---

OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

You may also want to check out giftwrap ( https://github.com/blueboxgroup/giftwrap )  and its helper giftwrap-wrapper ( https://github.com/blueboxgroup/giftwrap-wrapper ) which builds packages and/or docker containers for each openstack project based on a manifest file which contains their git location and version as well as letting you specifiy extra requirements etc.

I've looked over the koilla project and don't like the fact that it uses the system packages for openstack, nor do I particularly like the way its handling configuration.  

I also think that it makes a ton of sense to create config templates built with confd so that you can configure the projects by either environment variables or etcd/confd.  

I have a project called Factorish (https://github.com/factorish/factorish) which aims to take random apps and run them in a sensible way inside a docker container that ties in confd, etcdctl and runit and some healthchecking which has worked very well for me so far and have been planning on starting to build out openstack packages using it,  but haven't gotten very far yet due to a lack of time.

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Fox, Kevin M <Kevin.Fox@pnnl.gov> wrote:

Have you looked at the kolla project?

Thanks,
Kevin

 

---

From: CoreOS
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 5:08:12 AM
To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [Openstack-operators] OpenStack Dockerizing on CoreOS

Hello,

I’m trying to develop fault tolerance supporting OpenStack on Docker/CoreOS. I think this kind of approaching is to getting the following advantages:
   - Easy to Deploy
   - Easy to Test
   - Easy to Scale-out
   - Fault Tolerance

Those who are interested in non-stop operation and easy extension of OpenStack, please see the following link https://github.com/ContinUSE/openstack-on-coreos.

This work is currently in the beginning. Please contact me if you have any comments, or questions.

Thanks,
JW
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Answer 4

Hello,

Thank you for your various information including Kolla Project, and I need that I should review the information in detail.

I’m just starting OpenStack install, config, test etc. in personal interest. So I feel it is many difficulties at the installation stage such as many configuration options, complexity of installation, scaling increases complexity so on. The beginner who no one seems to be easily accessible.

My goal for this work , the first one is simplification of installation and the second one is Zero Down Time Operation Platform.

Once again thank you for your comments.

Best Regards,
JW

1. 
   
   1. 29., 오후 11:54, Paul Czarkowski pczarkowski+openstackops@bluebox.net 작성:

You may also want to check out giftwrap ( https://github.com/blueboxgroup/giftwrap https://github.com/blueboxgroup/giftwrap ) and its helper giftwrap-wrapper ( https://github.com/blueboxgroup/giftwrap-wrapper https://github.com/blueboxgroup/giftwrap-wrapper ) which builds packages and/or docker containers for each openstack project based on a manifest file which contains their git location and version as well as letting you specifiy extra requirements etc.

I've looked over the koilla project and don't like the fact that it uses the system packages for openstack, nor do I particularly like the way its handling configuration.

I also think that it makes a ton of sense to create config templates built with confd so that you can configure the projects by either environment variables or etcd/confd.

I have a project called Factorish (https://github.com/factorish/factorish https://github.com/factorish/factorish) which aims to take random apps and run them in a sensible way inside a docker container that ties in confd, etcdctl and runit and some healthchecking which has worked very well for me so far and have been planning on starting to build out openstack packages using it, but haven't gotten very far yet due to a lack of time.

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Fox, Kevin M <Kevin.Fox@pnnl.gov Kevin.Fox@pnnl.gov> wrote:
Have you looked at the kolla project?

Thanks,
Kevin

From: CoreOS
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 5:08:12 AM
To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [Openstack-operators] OpenStack Dockerizing on CoreOS

Hello,

I’m trying to develop fault tolerance supporting OpenStack on Docker/CoreOS. I think this kind of approaching is to getting the following advantages:
- Easy to Deploy
- Easy to Test
- Easy to Scale-out
- Fault Tolerance

Those who are interested in non-stop operation and easy extension of OpenStack, please see the following link https://github.com/ContinUSE/openstack-on-coreos https://github.com/ContinUSE/openstack-on-coreos.

This work is currently in the beginning. Please contact me if you have any comments, or questions.

Thanks,
JW

---

OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

---

OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

---

OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Hello,

Thank you for your various information including Kolla Project, and I need that I should review the information in detail.

I’m just starting OpenStack install, config, test etc. in personal interest. So I feel it is many difficulties at the installation stage such as many configuration options, complexity of installation, scaling increases complexity so on. The beginner who no one seems to be easily accessible.

 My goal for this work , the first one is simplification of installation and the second one is Zero Down Time Operation Platform.

Once again thank you for your comments.

Best Regards,

JW

2015. 4. 29., 오후 11:54, Paul Czarkowski <pczarkowski+openstackops@bluebox.net> 작성:

You may also want to check out giftwrap ( https://github.com/blueboxgroup/giftwrap )  and its helper giftwrap-wrapper ( https://github.com/blueboxgroup/giftwrap-wrapper ) which builds packages and/or docker containers for each openstack project based on a manifest file which contains their git location and version as well as letting you specifiy extra requirements etc.

I've looked over the koilla project and don't like the fact that it uses the system packages for openstack, nor do I particularly like the way its handling configuration.  

I also think that it makes a ton of sense to create config templates built with confd so that you can configure the projects by either environment variables or etcd/confd.  

I have a project called Factorish (https://github.com/factorish/factorish) which aims to take random apps and run them in a sensible way inside a docker container that ties in confd, etcdctl and runit and some healthchecking which has worked very well for me so far and have been planning on starting to build out openstack packages using it,  but haven't gotten very far yet due to a lack of time.

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Fox, Kevin M <Kevin.Fox@pnnl.gov> wrote:

Have you looked at the kolla project?

Thanks,
Kevin

 

---

From: CoreOS
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 5:08:12 AM
To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [Openstack-operators] OpenStack Dockerizing on CoreOS

Hello,

I’m trying to develop fault tolerance supporting OpenStack on Docker/CoreOS. I think this kind of approaching is to getting the following advantages:
   - Easy to Deploy
   - Easy to Test
   - Easy to Scale-out
   - Fault Tolerance

Those who are interested in non-stop operation and easy extension of OpenStack, please see the following link https://github.com/ContinUSE/openstack-on-coreos.

This work is currently in the beginning. Please contact me if you have any comments, or questions.

Thanks,
JW
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators