On 06/19/2015 11:40 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 06/19/2015 10:31 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Jun 19, 2015 3:56 PM, "Jay Pipes" <email@example.com
On 06/19/2015 09:19 AM, Ilya Shakhat wrote:
Some reasons of having complementary projects in Stackalytics:
* to compare efforts in other communities with OpenStack - just to
feed curiosity on what is larger OpenStack or Kubernetes?
* to light interest to contribute to projects that OpenStack
on, like OVS and Ansible.
* to keep an eye on commercial interest and know who is sponsoring
I agree that adding complementary projects was an authoritarian
and ready to remove them in the community version if TC decides so.
Personally, I quite like having those complementary projects in
Stackalytics, for the reasons you note above.
Although it's not very useful for 'reviews'
Sure, agreed :)
I also wonder how well maintained the email mappings are for
Good point. I'm sure there can be many improvements made to the support
for complementary projects. I was just remarking that I find the
information there to be interesting, nothing more.
I also find it interesting. I, in fact, added the ansible and python
packaging related repos to the list, because I found it interesting.
It's also nice to see that we're not completely insular - that we, as
OpenStack, also work with others. We have humans working in both
openstack and openvswitch, for instance. And who are working in ansible
and openstack. Etc. I think that's a great positive thing to be able to
highlight - we are, after all, not an island to ourselves, but are part
of a larger community.
So, my vote will be to keep them. I'm only one vote, of course, but I
think it would be a shame to get rid of them.