settingsLogin | Registersettings

[OpenStack-DefCore] [interop-challenge] Floating IPs

0 votes

Hi,

There is something strange when I run the ansible lampstack playbook.

At OVH we do not provide Floating IPs. Our default behavior is to provide directly the public IP on eth0 of the instances.

To make the app work, I need to use my "Ext-Net" (in privatenetname parameter) which is similar to a private network but it's directly routed.
As a consequence, the app will use the public network to communicate between nodes.

I know some other CSP have direct public IP on the instance too. Does it work like that for you?
Is it ok for the challenge on stage?

--
Jean-Daniel Bonnetot
ovh.com | @pilgrimstack


Defcore-committee mailing list
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
asked Oct 13, 2016 in defcore-committee by jean-daniel.bonnetot (600 points)  

7 Responses

0 votes

On 10/13/2016 08:31 AM, Jean-Daniel Bonnetot wrote:
Hi,

There is something strange when I run the ansible lampstack playbook.

At OVH we do not provide Floating IPs. Our default behavior is to provide directly the public IP on eth0 of the instances.

To make the app work, I need to use my "Ext-Net" (in privatenetname parameter) which is similar to a private network but it's directly routed.
As a consequence, the app will use the public network to communicate between nodes.

I know some other CSP have direct public IP on the instance too. Does it work like that for you?
Is it ok for the challenge on stage?

I don't know the answer for the challenge - but I will say:

THANK YOU for providing direct IPs on your VMs. As a user, it's wonderful.


Defcore-committee mailing list
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
responded Oct 13, 2016 by Monty_Taylor (22,780 points)   2 4 7
0 votes

Jean-Daniel,
I have run these tests on OVH cloud using the scripts, they worked very well. The scripts allow your cloud to use whatever way your neutron is done. I was the first one marked your cloud successful regarding the interop effort, so I think it is perfectly ok to show off that on stage.

Thanks.

Tong Li
IBM Open Technology
Building 501/B205
litong01@us.ibm.com

Monty Taylor ---10/13/2016 10:04:52 AM---On 10/13/2016 08:31 AM, Jean-Daniel Bonnetot wrote: > Hi,

From: Monty Taylor mordred@inaugust.com
To: defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
Date: 10/13/2016 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: [OpenStack-DefCore] [interop-challenge] Floating IPs

On 10/13/2016 08:31 AM, Jean-Daniel Bonnetot wrote:
Hi,

There is something strange when I run the ansible lampstack playbook.

At OVH we do not provide Floating IPs. Our default behavior is to provide directly the public IP on eth0 of the instances.

To make the app work, I need to use my "Ext-Net" (in privatenetname parameter) which is similar to a private network but it's directly routed.
As a consequence, the app will use the public network to communicate between nodes.

I know some other CSP have direct public IP on the instance too. Does it work like that for you?
Is it ok for the challenge on stage?

I don't know the answer for the challenge - but I will say:

THANK YOU for providing direct IPs on your VMs. As a user, it's wonderful.


Defcore-committee mailing list
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee

responded Oct 13, 2016 by Tong_Li (1,940 points)   2
0 votes

Ok, I ran it too and its ok on my side too.
If it's ok for the challenge it's a good news.

Do you remember which CSP are in the same case (not providing floating IPs)?

--
Jean-Daniel Bonnetot
ovh.com | @pilgrimstack

Le 13 oct. 2016 à 16:26, Tong Li litong01@us.ibm.com a écrit :

Jean-Daniel,
I have run these tests on OVH cloud using the scripts, they worked very well. The scripts allow your cloud to use whatever way your neutron is done. I was the first one marked your cloud successful regarding the interop effort, so I think it is perfectly ok to show off that on stage.

Thanks.

Tong Li
IBM Open Technology
Building 501/B205
litong01@us.ibm.com

<graycol.gif>Monty Taylor ---10/13/2016 10:04:52 AM---On 10/13/2016 08:31 AM, Jean-Daniel Bonnetot wrote: > Hi,

From: Monty Taylor mordred@inaugust.com
To: defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
Date: 10/13/2016 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: [OpenStack-DefCore] [interop-challenge] Floating IPs


On 10/13/2016 08:31 AM, Jean-Daniel Bonnetot wrote:
Hi,

There is something strange when I run the ansible lampstack playbook.

At OVH we do not provide Floating IPs. Our default behavior is to provide directly the public IP on eth0 of the instances.

To make the app work, I need to use my "Ext-Net" (in privatenetname parameter) which is similar to a private network but it's directly routed.
As a consequence, the app will use the public network to communicate between nodes.

I know some other CSP have direct public IP on the instance too. Does it work like that for you?
Is it ok for the challenge on stage?

I don't know the answer for the challenge - but I will say:

THANK YOU for providing direct IPs on your VMs. As a user, it's wonderful.


Defcore-committee mailing list
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee


Defcore-committee mailing list
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee


Defcore-committee mailing list
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
responded Oct 13, 2016 by jean-daniel.bonnetot (600 points)  
0 votes

Hi Jean-Daniel

DreamHost is also configured to provide a public IPv4 to VMs, we don't
provide floating IPs unless they're required. Check vars/dreamhost.yml
configuration file, to make the playbook work I leave privatenetname
empty.

HTH
stef

On 10/13/2016 07:42 AM, Jean-Daniel Bonnetot wrote:
Ok, I ran it too and its ok on my side too.
If it's ok for the challenge it's a good news.

Do you remember which CSP are in the same case (not providing floating
IPs)?

--
Jean-Daniel Bonnetot
ovh.com | @pilgrimstack

Le 13 oct. 2016 à 16:26, Tong Li <litong01@us.ibm.com
litong01@us.ibm.com> a écrit :

Jean-Daniel,
I have run these tests on OVH cloud using the scripts, they worked
very well. The scripts allow your cloud to use whatever way your
neutron is done. I was the first one marked your cloud successful
regarding the interop effort, so I think it is perfectly ok to show
off that on stage.

Thanks.

Tong Li
IBM Open Technology
Building 501/B205
litong01@us.ibm.com litong01@us.ibm.com

<graycol.gif>Monty Taylor ---10/13/2016 10:04:52 AM---On 10/13/2016
08:31 AM, Jean-Daniel Bonnetot wrote: > Hi,

From: Monty Taylor mordred@inaugust.com
To: defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
Date: 10/13/2016 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: [OpenStack-DefCore] [interop-challenge] Floating IPs


On 10/13/2016 08:31 AM, Jean-Daniel Bonnetot wrote:

Hi,

There is something strange when I run the ansible lampstack playbook.

At OVH we do not provide Floating IPs. Our default behavior is to
provide directly the public IP on eth0 of the instances.

To make the app work, I need to use my "Ext-Net" (in
privatenetname parameter) which is similar to a private network but
it's directly routed.
As a consequence, the app will use the public network to communicate
between nodes.

I know some other CSP have direct public IP on the instance too.
Does it work like that for you?
Is it ok for the challenge on stage?

I don't know the answer for the challenge - but I will say:

THANK YOU for providing direct IPs on your VMs. As a user, it's
wonderful.


Defcore-committee mailing list
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee


Defcore-committee mailing list
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee


Defcore-committee mailing list
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee


Defcore-committee mailing list
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
responded Oct 13, 2016 by stefano_plus_interop (280 points)  
0 votes

Ok, so all your communications between instances pass through the public network, right?

--
Jean-Daniel Bonnetot
ovh.com | @pilgrimstack

Le 13 oct. 2016 à 17:52, Stefano Maffulli stefano+interop@openstack.org a écrit :

Hi Jean-Daniel

DreamHost is also configured to provide a public IPv4 to VMs, we don't
provide floating IPs unless they're required. Check vars/dreamhost.yml
configuration file, to make the playbook work I leave privatenetname
empty.

HTH
stef

On 10/13/2016 07:42 AM, Jean-Daniel Bonnetot wrote:

Ok, I ran it too and its ok on my side too.
If it's ok for the challenge it's a good news.

Do you remember which CSP are in the same case (not providing floating
IPs)?

--
Jean-Daniel Bonnetot
ovh.com | @pilgrimstack

Le 13 oct. 2016 à 16:26, Tong Li <litong01@us.ibm.com
litong01@us.ibm.com> a écrit :

Jean-Daniel,
I have run these tests on OVH cloud using the scripts, they worked
very well. The scripts allow your cloud to use whatever way your
neutron is done. I was the first one marked your cloud successful
regarding the interop effort, so I think it is perfectly ok to show
off that on stage.

Thanks.

Tong Li
IBM Open Technology
Building 501/B205
litong01@us.ibm.com litong01@us.ibm.com

<graycol.gif>Monty Taylor ---10/13/2016 10:04:52 AM---On 10/13/2016
08:31 AM, Jean-Daniel Bonnetot wrote: > Hi,

From: Monty Taylor mordred@inaugust.com
To: defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
Date: 10/13/2016 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: [OpenStack-DefCore] [interop-challenge] Floating IPs


On 10/13/2016 08:31 AM, Jean-Daniel Bonnetot wrote:

Hi,

There is something strange when I run the ansible lampstack playbook.

At OVH we do not provide Floating IPs. Our default behavior is to
provide directly the public IP on eth0 of the instances.

To make the app work, I need to use my "Ext-Net" (in
privatenetname parameter) which is similar to a private network but
it's directly routed.
As a consequence, the app will use the public network to communicate
between nodes.

I know some other CSP have direct public IP on the instance too.
Does it work like that for you?
Is it ok for the challenge on stage?

I don't know the answer for the challenge - but I will say:

THANK YOU for providing direct IPs on your VMs. As a user, it's
wonderful.


Defcore-committee mailing list
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee


Defcore-committee mailing list
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee


Defcore-committee mailing list
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee


Defcore-committee mailing list
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee


Defcore-committee mailing list
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
responded Oct 13, 2016 by jean-daniel.bonnetot (600 points)  
0 votes

On 10/13/2016 09:07 AM, Jean-Daniel Bonnetot wrote:
Ok, so all your communications between instances pass through the
public network, right?

Correct, by default DreamHost instances have only one vNIC hooked to the
public network. Not exactly best practice but good enough for this demo.
We're documenting this for other scenarios for the customers who have
private networks enabled.


Defcore-committee mailing list
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
responded Oct 13, 2016 by stefano_plus_interop (280 points)  
0 votes

The script added logic to deal with different network configurations. but produces same results.

Thanks.

Tong Li
IBM Open Technology
Building 501/B205
litong01@us.ibm.com

Stefano Maffulli ---10/13/2016 12:43:59 PM---On 10/13/2016 09:07 AM, Jean-Daniel Bonnetot wrote: > Ok, so all your communications between instanc

From: Stefano Maffulli stefano+interop@openstack.org
To: "defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org" defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
Date: 10/13/2016 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: [OpenStack-DefCore] [interop-challenge] Floating IPs

On 10/13/2016 09:07 AM, Jean-Daniel Bonnetot wrote:
Ok, so all your communications between instances pass through the
public network, right?

Correct, by default DreamHost instances have only one vNIC hooked to the
public network. Not exactly best practice but good enough for this demo.
We're documenting this for other scenarios for the customers who have
private networks enabled.


Defcore-committee mailing list
Defcore-committee@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee

responded Oct 13, 2016 by Tong_Li (1,940 points)   2
...